Beijing 1989, 17 Mai, 15.00n hrs: 1.2 million people demonstrate at Tian An Men Square...

In memoriam Samuel Huntington

articles:

Though I don't agree with his refusal to apply the same civilisational critieria to judaism as to islamism nor with his unconditional support of Israel's racist policies, the Geert Wilders Jerusalem speech reveals in a excellent way the same katastrophe awaiting Europe as Guillaume Faye is able to depicture in my video interview with him.

UNITED NATIONS IN THE HANDS OF THE NATO KILLING MACHINE

Tariq Aziz still alive but fading away

What happened in Cologne on 20 september 2008?

Guillaume Faye, writer of 'The Colonisation of Europe' (by islam) adventured on a new way out from the vilification by the political elite and the media of those who denounce European ethno-masochism, by exploring new concepts of Machiavellian-type of co-operation.....
:The New Jewish Question by Guillaume Faye, Summary 05-06-2008 translated from French by Alfred Vierling.

The Hague, my home town, claims to be the 'Capital of International Law' , but which is the governmental residence of a country, though obliging its citizens each year to commemorate the victims of nazism, whose government committed horrendous war crimes within the framework of the NATO bombings on former Yougoslavia. My very university lecturer of international law Mr. Lammers defended these illegal bombings at the International Court of Justice in the Peace Palace in the Hague. The very Minister of Foreign Affairs at the time of the NATO warfare against Yougoslavia, Mr.van Aartsen, is now the Mayor of the Hague. He refused to receive Mr. Milenkovic seeking prosecution of the politicians and military involved in killing his daughter Sanja by a second NATO presumably Dutch air attack on the bridge of Varvarin, where she was about to assist victims of the first attack, both directed against citizens. In 1999 I denounced the war crimes by The Netherlands in an official procedure at the International Criminal Law Tribunal for former Yougoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, but to no avail. NATO's war crimes went unscreened and unjudged and will continue to take place in a world which sets aside its entire international law system when it suits the interests of its war machinery. Today NATO air strikes on Afghan citizens with the collaboration of the Dutch air force continue to commit genocide without any accountability before whatever court or tribunal. Nothing has changed since the Vietnam war, if not for the media to keep quite and turn a blind eye. The Vietnam war, the first and the last war to be broadcasted without censorship was conducive to at least some moral tribunals composed of philisophers like Mr. Russel, but now even the intelligentia collaborates withn the system. Only the 'Dialogue Forum' in Paris 1999, which I participated in, was active in denouncing the ICTY as a kangaroo court representing the NATO interests. The ICTY went as far as to have the Yougoslavian President Milosevic killed within its prison walls at the very moment that he would express the main part of his personally presented apologia and legal defence, nullifying any of the prefabricated NATO arguments to go to war. The ICTY even removed upon notification of the death of Mr. Milosevic his defence notules from its internet site, so only his legal assistants outside the ICTY framework and some specialists having attended in person his defense speeches at the ICTY buildings (I attended some) have a mere glance over his brilliant uncovery of the NATO war machine. Today NATO bombings are targeting civilians in Afghanisatan and Irak. What country is next? Iran ? Read the following denouncement, skip over the legally technical complicated passages and be aware of the hypocrisy of the Dutch politicians involved.
My denunciation of NATO War Crimes in Yougoslavia 1999
pdf-version

 

Though the present-day International Criminal Law Court has been based on an International Treaty it cannot be considered as a world penal law forum since the United States preclude the jurisdiction of it over its citizens.
It is a winners' court, not a really independent criminal court. The USA opposes an independent prosecutor. What is more, the Court is bound to contradict Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which presupposes a threat to international peace, not merely peace as a prerequisite for the Security Council to make use of its special powers under that chapter.
If President Clinton is supposed to be the father of The International Criminal Law Tribunal for Former Yougoslavia (ICTY), then Secretary Albright was its mother, both having stated openly that they rely on NATO governments for investigations. Though claiming independence from many national government this forum is totally dependent on national forces to arrest and bring up any suspect. The ICTY was financed mainly by the USA, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Open Society Institue of George Soros, Time-Warner and Discovery Products, both American companies. The Court claims to apply the presumption of innocence, but unlike normal criminal courts, the court itself is involved in the laying of the charges. When a charge is to be laid the approval of one of the trial judges must be obtained. That approval is only given if a prima facie case is established. That is, a case which if not answered could result in a conviction. Yet one claims presumption of innocence! The presumption is also compromised by automatic detention upon arrest and only very rare form of release pending trial. Prisoners are separated from family, friends, have to obey prison rules and are under permanent surveillance, censored mail rules, in short by whom are the suspects presumed to be innocent ?. The court is exempt of any protection against heresay evidence. Witnesses can testify anonymously or not shown in court. There are provisions for closed hearings in vaguely described circumstances, secret trials, use of sealed indictments, thast means no one knows in advance of arrest by military police in any country of what he/she is suspect of; suspects can be kept uptil 90 days without charge. Confessions are presumed to be free and volutary unless the contrary is established by the prisoner (who has been kept for 90 days by military police and prosecutors!! If you are arrested in a foreign country it sums up to exile! The choice of counselers is hampered by the possibility of severe fines for contempt and lawyers from some countries are barred on the ground there are already to many of them representing accused persons. No biased judge can be removed by the suspect. But most of all this new international criminal law forum smells like an instrument of war, thwartening subtle diplomatic peace deals by incriminalizing even (former) heads of states with whom the family of nations has been dealing , often promising exit strategies to them as a condition to their cooperation in an international peace deal. That was the case of Milosevic, that is the case of Karadzic:

Karadzic to Kangaroo Court

The 'international community' (i.e. USA. GB, Israel c.s.) denies a deal between USA and Karadzic about his acquittal in exchange of his retreat from public life. Vociferous denyer is the Rockefeller Foundation supported Dr. Voorhoeve, Dutch Minister of Defence during the Srebrenica debacle. See for yourself the denied agreement:

Karadzic-Holbrooke Agreement (srbska) english translation

John Glad adventures on ethics of eugenics, pleading for universal eugenics, to the profit of all mankind, provided that inter-ethnical conflicts be kept out from its ethical discussion to prevent ill will to proceed with eugenics even before it is able to reveal any improvement for us all
An Interview with the Russian scientific writer John Glad on eugenics
pdf-version

A description of the life of Horst Mahler (for my conversation with him look on this website's videos

Some narrow-minded ethno-nationalists denounce all life-styles but the nuclear family, but do so without scientific foundation in evolutionary theory:
Homosexuality as misunderstood by identary Ethno-Natalists

Though data about the sites of USA nuclear weapons 'sites in the Netherlands have been made public in USA Senate's files, Dutch Authorities kept them secret; Vierling published them in a university report on Dutch Involverment on Nuclear Armament in 1979 (free Un. of Amsterdam), later reproduced as a IPSA article:
Dutch Involvement in Nuclear Armament ( by Brookman & Vierling )
pdf-version

Georgia conflict revealing NATO agressiveness, a view by J. Oberg , totally agreed upon by Alfred Vierling